1.) Ethics
violation of the Educator’s Code of Ethics
*Standard 1.3;
Administrator submitting eight food receipts for a trip lasting several days
that had consecutive numbers. (fraudulent request for reimbursement)
Standard 2.3;
In small districts administrative spouses are hired and supervised by their
spouse. (hiring and evaluation of personnel)
2.) Consequences:
The short term
consequence for the administrator that submitted the meal receipts with
consecutive numbers was non-renewal of her contract. The long term consequences
in the district thereafter included more stringent guidelines for submitting
meal receipts to include writing your name, meal and date of the meal on the
back of the receipt. Additionally, the business office has included this in the
beginning of the year training and the point is crystal clear, in order to be
reimbursed for meals you must turn in one receipt, itemized, write your name on
the back and include the date.
The short term
consequences for the superintendent that directed the large contract towards a
person with whom he had a personal relationship includes a jail cell and
pending federal charges as well as negative publicity, nationwide. The long
term consequences are yet to be determined but I would imagine that contract in
excess of a specific dollar amount will be scrutinized and researched more
thoroughly with a transparent lens. Policy and procedures may be adopted and
practiced to ensure that future fraudulent or misappropriations of school
district funds are prevented.
3.) Preventive
Actions
To prevent
future fraudulent requests for meal reimbursement training could have been
provided that specifically detailed how the receipts were to be turned in to
the business office. The details would make it clear that someone is paying
attention and potentially deterred anyone from trying to submit a false claim.
This type of preventive action would clearly promote the highest standard of
conduct, ethical practices, and integrity in decision making, actions and
behaviors (SBEC Superintendent Competency1).
To prevent
gross misappropriation of district funds such as in the case with the El Paso
Superintendent the district could have a multi-pronged test in policy or in
procedures that is transparent and includes a statement that refers to existing
relationships with a business or company. This type of preventive action would
address, specifically, the strand from the SBEC Superintendent Competency 1
that states applying laws, policies, and procedures in a fair and reasonable
manner.
To prevent false statements from being made by employees especially during programmatic change (reduction in force) the district could make public the minutes of all board meeting and discussions that pertain to the status of these types of potential situations. An example of this publication could be a link on the district website that is shared with all employees through email. This preventive action would represent an interaction with district staff, students, school board, and community in a professional and ethical manner (SBEC Superintendent Competency1). Employment is a serious matter and transparency is essential during these times that include tough and difficult decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment